Southeast Asian Journal of Case Report and Review

Online ISSN: 2319-1090

Southeast Asian Journal of Case Report and Review is a Peer-reviewed, International medical journal Published by the Association of Health Professionals. It will publish 04 issues per year will publish a research paper prepared by Health Professional. Journal will Give Preference to Case Report and Review Article   Aim and Scope The aim and commitment of the journal is to publish a research-oriented manuscript on significant issues in all the subjects and areas of Medical Science including Genome mutation and Pathogenicity in microbes. Journal more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 471

PDF Downloaded: 175


Get Permission Anandh SM, Raju, kumar, Harikrishnan, Palanigoundar, and Babu: High volume stentolith in a case of neglected CBD stent: A case report


Introduction

About 10–15% of the population with cholelithiasis have choledocholithiasis.1 Choledocholithiasis may be primary or secondary. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) and stone removal with or without stent placement is the gold standard treatment for choledocholithiasis.2 This is followed by laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy for gall stones. Stents placed has to be removed within 4–6 weeks.

The complications of retained stents include stone formation, biofilm formation, cholangitis, stent migration, very rarely intestinal perforation.1, 3 Patient presents with abdominal pain, fever, and jaundice which leads to diagnosis. This article depicts one such case we encountered.

Case Report

Patient was a 78-year-old presented with fever, abdominal pain, loss of weight and appetite. Patient was a known hypertensive and had previously undergone ERCP and stenting 3 years back. Upon examination, patient was febrile and otherwise normal clinically. In blood investigation, LFT (liver function test) was deranged with elevation of mild bilirubin and enzymes. Ultrasound imaging revealed cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis with dilated intrahepatic biliary radicles and proximal CBD.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) was done. Gall bladder, cystic duct and entire common bile duct was filled with calculi (Figure 1, Figure 2 ). Stent was not visible. So exploration was planned. Diagnostic laparoscopy revealed extensive adhesions so proceeded with laparotomy. Patient underwent open cholecystectomy with CBD exploration. Stent with 28 calculi extracted. Stent was studded with stones and concretions (Figure 3 ). There was narrowing in the distal CBD. In view of obstructive jaundice due to narrowing and since already patient had complications associated with stenting, we decided to proceed with surgical biliary bypass. So patient underwent open cholecystectomy with CBD exploration with choledochojejinostomy and jejunojejunostomy. Post-operative period was uneventful.

Patient was reviewed one week after discharge. Liver function test was performed. Liver enzymes and bilirubin were normal (SGOT –50, SGPT–20, Total Bilirubin–2.5). USG done to check for residual collection and was normal. Patient was then reviewed after one month; had no symptoms and was doing well.

Figure 1

MRCP image depicting preoperative status. Entire CBD is studded with calculi; no stent could be visualized

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/f2b39f9b-8178-46cc-9e63-8f713c9f97f5/image/22a2dee7-1555-4e55-bbfc-20c83892a108-ufigure-1.jpg
Figure 2

MRCP image

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/f2b39f9b-8178-46cc-9e63-8f713c9f97f5/image/4c9bed38-bbf4-4457-b588-9f96a90a1b02-ufigure-2.jpg
Figure 3

Specimen image depicting retrieved stent along with concretions and multiple calculi

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/f2b39f9b-8178-46cc-9e63-8f713c9f97f5/image/feee23e0-91c4-4aa6-96cb-8491cb6e1125-ufigure-3.jpg

Discussion

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and stone extraction is widely accepted as the treatment of choice for a patient of any age with choledocholithiasis. This technique has been reported to be successful in 80–95% of the cases.4 Endoscopic removal of biliary stones may infrequently be impossible despite improved ERCP techniques, especially when large or impacted stones are present, or in cases of a coexisting narrowing of the distal common bile duct (CBD). Surgical procedures could be options for patients who failed endoscopic restoration of bile drainage. 5, 6

The CBD stents used are of two broad categories—plastic and metallic stents. Metallic stents are usually made of stainless steel or nickel-titanium alloy. Plastic stents are generally used as a temporary measure for post-ERCP, CBD clearance, palliative stenting in metastatic disease with an expected life span < 3 months, or temporary biliary drainage before surgery.

Plastic stents, although economical, are prone to getting occluded, primarily due to complexes formed of microbial colonies and bacterial byproducts coupled with calcium bilirubinate and calcium palmitate crystals, which eventually promote bacterial adherence and biofilm formation. The release of bacterial β-glucuronidase also plays a role by causing precipitation of calcium bilirubinate, which is aggregated into stones by glycoproteins. The retained stent also acts as a foreign body, thereby promoting colonization of the bacteria over it. 7, 8

Ideally stents has to be removed within 3–6 months.9 The most common complication of retained endoscopic stents are jaundice, cholangitis, choledocholithiasis, pancreatitis, internal migration. 10 The incidence of stentolith is around 18% in all cases with forgotten stent spanning over 2 years.

CBD stentolith may present with pain, fever, jaundice or recurrent cholangitis. Measures helpful in preventing or at least delaying occlusion of stent or stentolith formation could be use of prophylactic antibiotics, use of antibiotic impregnated stent, bile thinning compounds like ursodeoxycholic acid, placement of CBD stents and sphincterotomy when possible, use of a larger diameter stent.

Management involves endoscopic stent removal. But most patients who had developed symptoms will require laparoscopic or open CBD exploration and stent removal. Bilioenteric bypass with side-to-side Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy, CBD exploration with choledochoduodenostomy, and endoscopic clearance of stentoliths have also been done in some cases. 11, 12, 13

Conclusion

Unaware of the complications of long-dwelling biliary stents, patients ignore the advice for the timely removal of biliary stents. Detailed patient counselling, education and documentation are essential to avoid this condition.

Source of Funding

None

Consent of the Patient

Obtained for publishing.

Conflicts of Interest

None

References

1 

V Barai J Hedawoo S Changole Forgotten CBD stent (102 months) with stone-stent complex: A case reportInt J Surg Case Rep2016301624

2 

DM Culnan BJ Cicuto H Singh RA Cherry Percutaneous retrieval of a biliary stent after migration and ileal perforationWorld J Emerg Surg200946

3 

JW Leung JY Sung JW Costerton Bacteriological and electron microscopy examination of brown pigment stonesJ Clin Microbiol198927591521PMCID

4 

ME Lambert CD Betts J Hill EB Faragher DF Martin DE Tweedle Endoscopic sphincterotomy: the whole truthBr J Surg19917844736

5 

AC Chan EK Ng SC Chung CW Lai JY Lau JJ Sung JW Leung AK Li Common bile duct stones become smaller after endoscopic biliary stentingEndoscopy19983043569

6 

PB Cotton A Forbes JW Leung L Dineen Endoscopic stenting for long-term treatment of large bile duct stones: 2- to 5-year follow-upGastrointest Endosc19873364112

7 

G Donelli E Guaglianone R Di Rosa F Fiocca A Basoli Plastic biliary stent occlusion: factors involved and possible preventive approachesClin Med Res2007515360

8 

S Kumar A Chandra R Kulkarni AP Maurya V Gupta Forgotten biliary stents: ignorance is not blissSurg Endosc20173211915

9 

GD De Palma G Galloro G Siciliano C Catanzano Endoscopic stenting for definitive treatment of irretrievable common bile duct calculi. A long-term follow-up study of 49 patientsHepatogastroenterology20014837568PMID

10 

SH Sohn JH Park KH Kim TN Kim Complications and management of forgotten long-term biliary stentsWorld J Gastroenterol20172346228PMCID

11 

M Bajbouj M Treiber L Ludwig E Frimberger RM Schmid B Neu Forgotten biliary endoprosthesis. "Follow up" after 10 yearsEndoscopy2008402E221

12 

V Gupta A Chandra M Noushif SK Singh Giant stentolith: complication of a forgotten biliary stentEndoscopy2013452

13 

S Kumar A Chandra Giant stentolith: A rare complication of long-dwelling biliary endoprosthesisArab J Gastroenterol20202121324



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Case Report


Article page

25-27


Authors Details

Anandh SM, Karthikeyan Raju, Senthil kumar, Archana Harikrishnan, Raju Palanigoundar, Ganesh Babu


Article History

Received : 11-11-2023

Accepted : 13-12-2023


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files